Ligat Ha'al · Saturday, 29 August 2026 · 18:00. Our rating makes this 47% to go over 2.5 goals, so our lean is under. The Ligat Ha'al average is 53%.
Open this match in the app →| Market | Yes | No | Our call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 2.5 goals | 47% | 53% | Under |
| Over 3.5 goals | 27% | 73% | no pick |
| Both teams to score | 54% | 46% | Yes |
The result model puts Hapoel Petah Tikva at 38%, the draw at 29% and Hapoel Katamon at 33%, from expected goals of 1.14 and 1.04.
The league sets the starting point. Ligat Ha'al has produced over 2.5 goals in 53% of its matches, and that is where a team with no record of its own would sit.
Each side's own record. Hapoel Petah Tikva have 20 in 36 this season (9 of 18 at home), Hapoel Katamon 13 in 33 (7 of 17 away). Those records are pulled toward the league rate with the weight of about 32 matches — enough that two or three unusual games cannot swing a rating — giving 53% and 45%.
The mix. Weighted 40% home side, 40% away side and 20% league — the split that beat every alternative across 30,582 matches of testing — that gives 50%.
Head to head. These sides have met 5 times in three years, producing over 2.5 goals in 60%. That nudges the number 10% of the way toward the head-to-head pattern — deliberately small, because fixtures change more than reputations do — landing on 51%.
Goal expectation. Separately a Poisson model built from attack and defence strength — using real expected-goals data where the league has it — puts this match at 37%, from expected goals of 1.14 for Hapoel Petah Tikva and 1.04 for Hapoel Katamon. Folding in 30% of that view gives 47%.
This breakdown is generated from the same inputs the rating uses, so it cannot describe a calculation we did not perform. The full model is set out in the methodology.
| Team | Games | O2.5 | O3.5 | BTTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hapoel Petah Tikva | 36 | 56% | 44% | 56% |
| Hapoel Katamon | 33 | 39% | 18% | 48% |
More: Hapoel Petah Tikva season stats · Hapoel Katamon season stats · Ligat Ha'al table and form. Ratings are calibrated probabilities, not tips — a 60% call is expected to miss two times in five.