Urvalsdeild · Friday, 17 April 2026. Final score 5–2 (half-time 2–0). Rebuilt from the season as it stood that morning, our rating would have been 68% for over 2.5 goals. This match is older than our frozen ratings ledger, which keeps 30 days, so that figure is a reconstruction from pre-match data rather than a number we published at the time — a distinction worth making, because only the frozen ones prove what we actually said beforehand.
Open this match in the app →| Market | Yes | No | Our call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 2.5 goals | 68% | 32% | Over |
| Over 3.5 goals | 47% | 53% | Over |
| Both teams to score | 68% | 32% | Yes |
The result model puts KR Reykjavik at 52%, the draw at 21% and Thor Akureyri at 27%, from expected goals of 2.28 and 1.63.
The league sets the starting point. Urvalsdeild has produced over 2.5 goals in 61% of its matches, and that is where a team with no record of its own would sit.
Each side's own record. KR Reykjavik have 1 in 1 this season (1 of 1 at home), Thor Akureyri 1 in 1 (1 of 1 away). Those records are pulled toward the league rate with the weight of about 24 matches — enough that two or three unusual games cannot swing a rating — giving 62% and 62%.
Last season still counts, briefly. With 1 and 1 games played this season, last season's rates are still blended in and fade out entirely by game 40 — the point at which our testing showed they stop adding accuracy. A single season is part luck, so each club's record is first pulled toward the league average by 34 games' weight. That moves the two figures to 71% and 62%.
The mix. Weighted 40% home side, 40% away side and 20% league — the split that beat every alternative across 30,582 matches of testing — that gives 66%.
Goal expectation. Separately a Poisson model built from attack and defence strength — using real expected-goals data where the league has it — puts this match at 75%, from expected goals of 2.28 for KR Reykjavik and 1.63 for Thor Akureyri. Folding in 30% of that view gives 68%.
This breakdown is generated from the same inputs the rating uses, so it cannot describe a calculation we did not perform. The full model is set out in the methodology.
| Team | Games | O2.5 | O3.5 | BTTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR Reykjavik | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Thor Akureyri | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% |
More: KR Reykjavik season stats · Thor Akureyri season stats · Urvalsdeild table and form. Ratings are calibrated probabilities, not tips — a 60% call is expected to miss two times in five.