Kaizer Chiefs have gone over 2.5 goals in 3 of 8 league games this season (38%) — 25% at home, 50% away. They've scored 13 and conceded 8, so their matches average 2.63 goals, and both teams have scored in 75% of them. Record: 3-5-0 in the PSL, where the division average is 35% over 2.5.
Full Kaizer Chiefs season view in the app →Their games land close to the PSL norm for goals — 38% over 2.5 against a division average of 35%. That ranks them 7th of 16 for goals in their matches, 3rd for scoring (1.63 a game) and 8th for goals conceded (1.00). They've kept 2 clean sheets and failed to score 1 time in 8 games.
Across 8 matches with half-time data, 67% of the goals in their games have come after the break (7 before, 14 after). Kaizer Chiefs themselves have scored 4 in first halves and 9 in second — a distinctly second-half team.
| P | W | D | L | GF | GA | O2.5 | O3.5 | BTTS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 13 | 8 | 38% | 38% | 75% |
| Home | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 25% | 25% | 75% |
| Away | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 50% | 50% | 75% |
Home/away splits are small samples — our 30,582-match study found ~94% of such gaps are indistinguishable from chance, which is why the app's ratings pool them rather than trusting the split.
Their most common result this season is 1–1 (3 times). Biggest win: 2–0 at home to Sekhukhune United (Wed 12 Aug). 1 of their 8 games have produced five goals or more. Current run: 3 straight matches under 2.5 goals. They are unbeaten in 8.
Streaks read louder than they predict: our break study found a three-game goals run carries roughly ±4.6 points of signal — real, but small, and it resets entirely after a long lay-off.
In 30 league games last season Kaizer Chiefs's matches went over 2.5 goals 20% of the time. This season they're running hotter at 38%, up 18 points, though 8 games is a small sample to read much into.
Fixture links open our full rating for that match — form, head-to-head, goal timing and the score projection. How those are built is set out in the methodology.