Kvindeligaen (W) · Tuesday, 3 November 2026 · 18:00 UK time
CompactStats rates AGF W vs Midtjylland W (Kvindeligaen (W), Tuesday, 3 November 2026) 58% for over 2.5 goals and 53% for both teams to score, with AGF W 37%, the draw 26% and Midtjylland W 38%.
| Market | Our chance | Call |
|---|---|---|
| Over 2.5 goals | 58% | Over |
| Over 3.5 goals | 38% | – |
| Both teams to score | 53% | Yes |
| AGF W win | 37% | |
| Draw | 26% | |
| Midtjylland W win | 38% | Pick |
| Goal in the 1st half | 78% | |
| Goal in the 2nd half | 78% | |
| Goal in both halves | 63% |
In the app: live scores, every market including half-time goals, sortable tables and a slip you can share.
| Team | Games | O2.5 | O3.5 | BTTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGF W | 11 | 73% | 36% | 45% |
| Midtjylland W | 12 | 50% | 33% | 50% |
| This match | League | |
|---|---|---|
| Goal in the 1st half | 78% | 76% |
| 2+ goals in the 1st half | 41% | 42% |
| Goal in the 2nd half | 78% | 79% |
| 2+ goals in the 2nd half | 44% | 43% |
| Goal in both halves | 63% | 64% |
| Half with most goals | 2nd 41% | 2nd 39% |
| Team (own games) | 1st half goal | 2nd half goal | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGF W | 74% | 72% | 50 |
| Midtjylland W | 85% | 79% | 39 |
League = last season and this season combined (this season alone 86% in the 1st half). Every match ranked: first half goals today · second half · both halves · tomorrow.
More: AGF W season stats · Midtjylland W season stats · Kvindeligaen (W) table and form
League. Kvindeligaen (W) has had over 2.5 goals in 58% of its games. That is the starting point.
Each side. AGF W 8 of 11 (4 of 6 at home), Midtjylland W 6 of 12 (3 of 6 away). Steadied toward the league rate, so a few odd games can't swing it: 63% and 55%.
Last season. Still blended in until game 40: 58% and 57%.
Mix. 40% home side, 40% away side, 20% league: 58%.
Head to head. 3 meetings in 3 years, 100% over 2.5 goals. A small 5% nudge: 60%.
Goal model. Expected goals 1.43 (AGF W) v 1.46 (Midtjylland W) give 55%; 30% weight: 58%.
Worked from the same inputs as the rating. The full model is in the methodology.
They are calibrated chances: a 60% call should land about six times in ten and miss about four. Ratings freeze before kick-off and are graded afterwards. The model reads goals, not team news, so it knows nothing about injuries, rotation or weather. Stats, not advice · 18+.