AFC Champions · Wednesday, 14 October 2026 · 11:00. Final score 5–1 (half-time 5–0). We made no pick on this game before kick-off; our pre-match rating was 43% for over 2.5 goals.
Open this match in the app →| Market | Yes | No | Our call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 2.5 goals | 43% | 57% | no pick |
| Over 3.5 goals | 20% | 80% | no pick |
| Both teams to score | 47% | 53% | no pick |
The result model puts Kashiwa Reysol at 44%, the draw at 28% and Port FC at 27%, from expected goals of 1.36 and 1.
The league sets the starting point. AFC Champions has produced over 2.5 goals in 45% of its matches, and that is where a team with no record of its own would sit.
Each side's own record. Kashiwa Reysol have 8 in 20 this season (5 of 10 at home), Port FC 0 in 0. Those records are pulled toward the league rate with the weight of about 24 matches — enough that two or three unusual games cannot swing a rating — giving 43% and 45%.
Last season still counts, briefly. With 20 and 0 games played this season, last season's rates are still blended in and fade out entirely by game 40 — the point at which our testing showed they stop adding accuracy. A single season is part luck, so each club's record is first pulled toward the league average by 34 games' weight. That moves the two figures to 42% and 45%.
The mix. Weighted 40% home side, 40% away side and 20% league — the split that beat every alternative across 30,582 matches of testing — that gives 44%.
Goal expectation. Separately a Poisson model built from attack and defence strength — using real expected-goals data where the league has it — puts this match at 42%, from expected goals of 1.36 for Kashiwa Reysol and 1 for Port FC. Folding in 30% of that view gives 43%.
Season opener. One of these sides has not played a league game yet. Openers run about 2.5 points under their league's norm, measured across 2,727 of them, so the rating is docked to 41%.
Calibration. Tested against 97,729 past matches, our ratings below 55% have run consistently too pessimistic — a figure in the high 30s, for instance, has come in about four points higher. So ratings in that range are lifted part-way back, giving 43%.
This breakdown is generated from the same inputs the rating uses, so it cannot describe a calculation we did not perform. The full model is set out in the methodology.
| Team | Games | O2.5 | O3.5 | BTTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kashiwa Reysol | 20 | 40% | 20% | 35% |
| Port FC | 0 | — | — | — |
More: AFC Champions fixtures. Ratings are calibrated probabilities, not tips — a 60% call is expected to miss two times in five.