IF Gnistan v Ilves W — prediction, stats and goal analysis

Kansallinen Liiga (W) · Sunday, 17 May 2026. Final score 2–3 (half-time 2–1). Rebuilt from the season as it stood that morning, our rating would have been 74% for over 2.5 goals. This match is older than our frozen ratings ledger, which keeps 30 days, so that figure is a reconstruction from pre-match data rather than a number we published at the time — a distinction worth making, because only the frozen ones prove what we actually said beforehand.

Open this match in the app →

Our ratings for this match

MarketYesNoOur call
Over 2.5 goals74%26%Over
Over 3.5 goals52%48%Over
Both teams to score61%39%Yes

The result model puts IF Gnistan at 60%, the draw at 19% and Ilves W at 21%, from expected goals of 2.5 and 1.45.

How we got this number

The league sets the starting point. Kansallinen Liiga (W) has produced over 2.5 goals in 69% of its matches, and that is where a team with no record of its own would sit.

Each side's own record. IF Gnistan have 5 in 5 this season (2 of 2 at home), Ilves W 5 in 5 (2 of 2 away). Those records are pulled toward the league rate with the weight of about 24 matches — enough that two or three unusual games cannot swing a rating — giving 74% and 74%.

The mix. Weighted 40% home side, 40% away side and 20% league — the split that beat every alternative across 30,582 matches of testing — that gives 73%.

Goal expectation. Separately a Poisson model built from attack and defence strength — using real expected-goals data where the league has it — puts this match at 76%, from expected goals of 2.5 for IF Gnistan and 1.45 for Ilves W. Folding in 30% of that view gives 74%.

This breakdown is generated from the same inputs the rating uses, so it cannot describe a calculation we did not perform. The full model is set out in the methodology.

Season form

TeamGamesO2.5O3.5BTTS
IF Gnistan5100%80%60%
Ilves W5100%60%80%

More: IF Gnistan season stats · Ilves W season stats · Kansallinen Liiga (W) table and form. Ratings are calibrated probabilities, not tips — a 60% call is expected to miss two times in five.